Using too much water or throwing rubbish into our rivers are clear ways that humans can put our water supply in danger ,but we also affect our water supply in less obvious ways .You may wonder how paving(鋪砌) a road can lead to less useable fresh water. A major part of the water we use every day is groundwater . Groundwater does not come from lakes or rivers .It come from underground . The more roads and parking lots we pave ,the less water can flow into the ground to become groundwater .
Human activity is not responsible for all water shortages(短缺). Driver climates are of course more likely to have droughts(干旱) than areas with more  rainfall  ,but in any case, good management can help to make sure there is enough water to meet our basic needs .
Thinking about the way we use water every day can make a big difference ,too In the United States ,a family of four can use 1.5tons of water a day ! This shows how much we depend on water to live ,but there’s a lot we can do to lower the number .
You can take steps to save water in your home .To start with ,use the same glass for your drinking water all day .Wash it only once a day .Run your dishwasher (洗碗機(jī))only when it is full .Help your parents fix any leaks in your home . You can even help to keep our water supply clean by recycling batteries instead of throwing them away .
【小題1】Which of the following is most likely to lead to less groundwater ?

A．Using river water .
B．Throwing batteries away .
C．paving parking lots .
D．Throwing rubbish into lakes .
【小題2】What can be inferred from the text ?
A．All water shortages are due to human behavior .
B．It takes a lot of effort to meet our water needs .
C．There is much we can do to reduce family size .
D．The average family in America makes proper use of water .
【小題3】The last paragraph is intended to              .
A．show us how to fix leaks at home
B．tell us how to run a dishwasher
C．prove what drinking glass is best for us
D．suggest what we do to save water at home
【小題4】The text is mainly about            .
A．Why paving roads reduces our water
B．how much we depend on water to live
C．why droughts occur more in dry climates
D．how human activity affects our water supply


【小題1】C
【小題2】B
【小題3】D
【小題4】D

解析試題分析：這是一篇關(guān)于用水問題的議論文。告訴我們，盡管大量用水和污染水源使人類用水處于危險(xiǎn)境地，但是人類一些小型的活動也對用水問題有著巨大的影響。短文詳細(xì)描寫了生活中容易造成浪費(fèi)的一些用水問題，并提出了相應(yīng)的建議。
【小題1】細(xì)節(jié)題，根據(jù)The more roads and parking lots we pave , the less water can　ｆlow into the ground to become groundwater. 可知導(dǎo)致地下水減少的是鋪設(shè)停車場，選Ｃ。
【小題2】細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)第一段good management can help to make sure there is enough water to meet our basic needs及下文描述，可知要滿足我們的用水需求需要很大的努力, 故選B。
【小題3】細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)You can take steps to save water in your home. 及本段描述，可知本段主要是針對如何節(jié)水提出建議，選Ｄ。
【小題4】主旨題：縱觀全文可知這篇短文主要描述了人類活動與水資源的短缺的關(guān)系。
考點(diǎn)：考查環(huán)保類短文

練習(xí)冊系列答案
相關(guān)習(xí)題

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

In July 1994 Jupiter, the largest planet in our solar system, was struck by 21 pieces of a comet（彗星）. When the fragment（碎片）landed in the southern part of the giant planet, the explosions were watched by scientists here on earth. But what if our own planet was hit by a comet?
The year is 2094. It has been announced that a comet is heading towards the Earth. Most of it will miss our plant, but two fragments will probably hit the southern part of the Earth. The news has caused panic.
On 17 July, a fragment four kilometers wide enters the Earth’s atmosphere with a huge explosion. About half of the fragment is destroyed. But the major part survives and hits the South Atlantic at 200 times the speed of sound. The sea boils and an enormous wave is created and spreads. The wall of water rushes towards southern Africa at 800 kilometers an hour. Cities on the African coast are totally destroyed and millions of people are drowned. The wave moves into the Indian Ocean and heads towards Asia.
Millions of people are already dead in the southern part of the Earth, but the north won’t escape for long. Tons of broken pieces are thrown into the atmosphere by the explosions. As the sun is hidden by clouds of dust, temperatures around the world fall to almost zero. Crops are ruined. Wars break out as countries fight for food. A year later civilization has collapsed. No more than 10 million people have survived.
Could it really happen? In fact, it has already happened more than once in the history of the Earth. The dinosaurs（恐龍）were on the Earth for over 160 million years. Then 65 million years ago they suddenly disappeared. Many scientists believe that the Earth was hit by a space fragment. The dinosaurs couldn’t survive in the cold climate that followed and they became extinct. Will we meet the same end?
【小題1】Which of the following is NOT TRUE according to the author’s description of the disaster in 2094?

A．The whole world becomes extremely cold.
B．All the coastal cities in African are destroyed.
C．The whole mankind becomes extinct.
D．The visit of the comet results in wars.
【小題2】Why does the author mention dinosaurs at the end of the passage?
A．Because they could only live in the warm climate.
B．Because they once ruled the Earth.
C．Because their extinction shows future disasters.
D．Because dinosaurs and humans never live in the same age.
【小題3】In writing the passage, the author intends to_________.
A．give an accurate description of the possible disaster in the future
B．prove that humans will sooner or later be destroyed
C．tell the historical development of the Earth
D．warn of a possible disaster in the future
【小題4】It can be concluded that the passage is most probably part of a(n)________.
A．terror story B．news report
C．research paper D．a(chǎn)rticle of popular science

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

Cutting global warming pollution would not only make the planet healthier, it would make people healthier too, new research suggests.
Cutting carbon dioxide emissions could save millions of lives, mostly by reducing preventable deaths from heart and lung diseases, according to studies released Wednesday and published in a special issue of The Lancet British medical journal.
“Relying on fossil fuels leads to unhealthy lifestyles, increasing our chances for getting sick and in some cases takes years from our lives,” US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a telecast (電視廣播) briefing from her home state of Kansas. “As greenhouse gas emissions go down, so do deaths from cardiovascular (心血管的) and respiratory diseases (呼吸疾病). This is not a small effect.”
Instead of looking at the health ills caused by future global warming, as past studies have done, this research looks at the immediate benefits of doing something about the problem, said Linda Birnbaum, director of the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Some possible benefits seemed highly speculative (投機(jī)的，推測的), the researchers conceded (承認(rèn)，給予), based on people driving less and walking and cycling more. Other proposals studied were more concrete and achievable, such as reducing cook stoves that burn dung (糞便), charcoal and other polluting fuels in the developing world.
And cutting carbon dioxide emissions also makes the air cleaner, reducing lung damage for millions of people, doctors said.
“Here are ways you can attack major health problems at the same time as dealing with climate change," said lead author Dr. Paul Wilkinson, an environmental epidemiologist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Wilkinson said the individual studies came up with numbers of premature deaths prevented or extra years of life added for certain places.
For example, switching to low-polluting cars in London and Delhi, India, would save 160 lost years of life in London and nearly 1,700 in Delhi for every million residents, one study found. But if people also drove less and walked or biked more, those extra saved years would soar (高聳，高漲) to more than 7,300 years in London and 12,500 years in Delhi because of less heart disease.
【小題1】What does the passage mainly about?

A．How can people live longer.
B．Cutting carbon dioxide emissions saves life.
C．Global warming threatens people’s lives
D．People should stop relying on fossil fuels
【小題2】The new research differs from past studies in that ________.
A．it focuses on the immediate benefits of cutting carbon dioxide emissions
B．it studies the bad effects arising from future global warming
C．it is believed by most people
D．it mainly targets at developing countries
【小題3】According to Kathleen Sebelius ________.
A．sometimes it takes years to see the bad effects caused by consuming fossil fuels
B．without greenhouse gas emissions, people would not die of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases
C．the main reason why people get sick is that they rely on fossil fuels
D．death from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases are closely related to greenhouse gas emissions
【小題4】It can be inferred from the passage that ________.
A．London and Delhi have already benefited from reducing greenhouse gas emissions
B．switching to low-polluting cars would save 160 lives in London every year
C．walking and biking instead of driving will reduce the chance of heart disease
D．a(chǎn)ttacking health problems and dealing with climate change are contradictory

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

Shopping green can make an important contribution to protecting the planet and conserving its resources.
Today’s consumer faces a wider range of choices than ever before, Add to that the steady stream of sales campaigns, and shopping smart only gets harder. To buy economically and reduce waste, safeguard health and protect the environment, you’ll need to follow some basic principles and have a clear idea of what you want.
1. Do Your Homework
Before making any major purchase, take the time to research it. Plentiful resources are usually available online. Avoid buying in a hurry, and don’t be persuaded by overenthusiastic salespeople. Sleep on it if necessary—you won’t regret giving yourself some extra time to think.
2. Take the Long View
Consider the running costs as well as the initial price of any item you buy. Many environmentally friendly products cost more to buy, but save you money in the long run. Choose items that are made to last. For example, pick a sofa that has a hardwood or steel frame rather than one made of softwood, which may break easily.
3. Skip the Disposable Option
Buy reusable products like washable cloth towels, handkerchiefs, serviettes（餐巾）and cleaning cloths rather than paper, single-use varieties. Avoid other disposable supplies like cups, glasses, and chopsticks, too.
4. Take the Local Route
Buy local products that are in season. It’s usually cheaper and fresher and has less harm to the environment. Markets and roadside stands are good sources. Some supermarkets also buy from local producers. Support it if you have one.
5. Avoid Wasteful Packaging
Better not buy products that have too much packaging. It’s estimated that approximately 10 percent of every shopping bill is actually paying for packaging—which you normally just throw away! Moreover, significant amounts of energy are used in the production of packaging. Purchasing refillable and renewable containers can also help cut this kind of waste.
【小題1】What could be the best title for this passage?

A．Protection of the Planet
B．Green Shopping Principles
C．Environmentally Friendly Products
D．Resource Conservation
【小題2】The underlined phrase “sleep on it” has the similar meaning with      .
A．think it over B．forget about it
C．set it aside D．put it into action
【小題3】Why does the author advise us to buy lasting products?
A．Because they are less expensive to buy.
B．Because they save money in the long run.
C．Because they will never break.
D．Because they are local products.
【小題4】Which of the following can be considered green shopping?
A．Following the stream of sales campaigns.
B．Buying disposable chopsticks.
C．Focusing on packaging.
D．Purchasing from local markets.

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

The way we get about has a deep influence on the way we live－affecting where we set up home, work and holiday. So what changes might come in the way we get around? What big ideas are out there, and do they have any chance of coming true?
Personal Air Travel
The idea: flying cars
Developments in light small plane technology will make it possible for everyone to own what are, in fact, flying cars. They will have closed cabins, heating, stereos and room for two people.
You will take off from a field near your home and fly to towns and cities. After landing, you will take off the fixed wing and continue your journey by road just as if you were traveling by car.
Fuel efficient engines and the advantage of being able to travel in the sky will keep costs and the environmental influence down.
Flying for Fun
The idea: Jet Packs
The idea was a hit when a stuntman (特技演員) flew around on one during the opening ceremony of the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics, which was very successful.
You’ll be able to use the equipment－roughly the size of two scuba tanks fastened to your back－for short journeys.
They will be handy for cleaning hard-to-reach windows, arriving in style at a party and shopping.
Taxis
The idea: driverless taxis
These computer-controlled taxis will take you wherever you want along a fixed route, whenever you want to go.
For the price of one person’s bus fare, several people can ride at speeds of up to 25 mph, and there will be fences to guard against accidents.
There will be little, if any, wait for the use of the taxis, which will leave from stations and will be used by prepaid cards.
The taxis, which will travel on a 1.5 m-wide track, will use 75% less energy per passenger than a car and 50% less than a bus.
【小題1】The passage is mainly about ________.      

A．future travel B．big ideas and dreams
C．a(chǎn)dvanced technology D．the influence of travel
【小題2】We learn from the passage that flying cars ________.
A．will operate only in the sky
B．will be more expensive than common cars
C．will have fewer bad effects on the environment
D．won’t be equipped with things similar to what cars have
【小題3】With Jet Packs, we can do all the following EXCEPT________.
A．a(chǎn)ttend a party B．clean high windows
C．go shopping D．have a long journey
【小題4】As for driverless taxis, we can infer that__________.
A．We can go wherever we want in them
B．They will be both cost-effective and safe
C．It costs more to take them than to take ordinary cars
D．They will be operated by computers as well as by people

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

In the rush to get to school, you drop a piece of toast on the floor. Do you throw it away or dec ide it’ s still OK to eat? If you’re like most people, you eat it. Maybe you follow the “5-second rule”, which claims foods are safe to eat if you pick them up within 5 seconds after dropping them. But you might want to think again. Scientists now say that 5 seconds is all it takes for foods to become polluted with enough bacteria（細(xì)菌） to make you sick.
Bacteria can cause many kinds of illnesses. Some kinds of bacteria can grow on food. If you eat foods on which these bacteria are growing, you can become sick.
One of these food-borne bacteria is Salmonella. It makes 1.4 million people sick every year. Salmonella is often found in raw eggs and chicken. Cooking kills these bacteria, which is why it is so important to cook eggs, chicken, and other foods thoroughly.
But how long does it take these bacteria to pollute food? A team of scientists in South Carolina did an experiment. First, they placed an amount of Salmonella on three surfaces; wood, tile (瓦片), and carpet. They placed a piece of bread and a piece of bologna（大臘腸） on each surface for 5,30, or 60 seconds. After just 5 seconds, both the bread and the bologna picked up enough bacteria to make you sick.
So forget the 5-second rule. If your toast drops on the floor, throw it away and get another piece of clean toast. This time, be careful not to drop it!
【小題1】 In which part of a newspaper can you most probably find this passage?

A．CultureB．HealthC．AdvertisementD．Technology
【小題2】After dropping a piece of toast , a person who follows the “5-second rule”will
A．throw away dirty toast immediately and go away
B．pick up the toast as quickly as possible and eat it
C．eat the toast within 5 seconds and feel pleased
D．get another piece of clean toast quickly and eat it
【小題3】 The scientists in South Carolina did the experiment to
A．see how quickly bacteria can pollute food
B．show that the 5-second rule a correct
C．see how harmful bacteria are to people’ health
D．show that bacteria grow at different speeds on different foods
【小題4】 What’s the writer’s attitude to the “5-second rule”?
A．PositiveB．NegativeC．Neutral (中立)D．Cautious (謹(jǐn)慎)

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

C
When an ant dies, other ants take it out of the nest, often within an hour after its death. This behavior interests scientists and they wonder how ants know for sure--and so soon--that another ant is dead.
One scientist recently came up with a way to explain this ant behavior. Dong-Hwan Choe is a biologist, a scientist who studies animals and plants. He found that ants have a chemical on the outside of their bodies that signals to other ants, “I’m dead--take me away” when it is dead.
One scientist recently came up with a way to explain this ant behavior. Dong-Hwan Choe is a biologist, a scientist who studies animals and plants. He found that ants have a chemical on the outside of their bodies that signals to other ants, “I’m dead---take me away” when it is dead.
But there's a question to answer: As we know, if an ant is dead, it stops moving. But when an ant is sleeping or knocked unconscious, it is also not moving. However, other ants don't move the living ant out of the nest. How do they know this ant is not dead? Choe found that ants have another chemical on their bodies, which tells nearby ants something like, “Wait—I'm not dead yet” when it is not dead. Choe suspects that when an ant dies, the chemical that says, “Wait— I'm not dead yet” quickly goes away. When other ants detect the “dead” chemical without the “not dead yet” chemical, they move away the body.
To test his theory, Choe and his team put different chemicals on ants. When the scientists used the “I'm dead” chemical, other ants quickly moved the treated ant away. When the scientists used the “Wait—I'm not dead yet” chemical, other ants left the treated ant alone. Choe believes this behavior shows that the “not dead yet” chemical overrides the “dead” chemical when picked up by other ants. And that when an ant dies, the “not dead yet” chemical fades away. Other nearby ants then detect the remaining “dead” chemical and remove the body from the nest.
Understanding this behavior can help scientists figure out how to stop ants from invading new places and causing problems.
【小題1】What is the function of the first paragraph?

A．Leading the following paragraphs.
B．Showing the main idea of the passage.
C．Introducing the background of the passage.
D．Giving a summary of the passage.
【小題2】Which of the following has the closest meaning to the underlined word “overrides” in the fourth paragraph?
A．is weaker thanB．is stronger thanC．is better thanD．is worse than
【小題3】What can we learn from the passage?
A．Living ants can also be taken away when they are not moving.
B．When an ant dies, it can tell others using a certain chemical.
C．A living ant can pretend to be dead using a special chemical.
D．Ants often use chemicals to communicate with each other.
【小題4】Which of the following descriptions about Dong-Hwan Choe is right?
A．Choe did this study in order to stop ants from invading new places.
B．Choe is a biologist who is only interested in animals, especially in ants.
C．Choe first came up with an idea to explain this ant behavior，and then did some tests to prove his theory.
D．Choe did the research on this ant behavior on his own.

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

All around the world, shoppers flock to Wal-Mart to buy everything. In Texas, they come for another reason: to see the wind turbine（渦輪機(jī)）, which supplies 5% of the store’s electricity. It along with other facilities, such as exterior walls coated with heat-reflective paint, makes this Wal-Mart a green giant.
The laws of economics suggest that Wal-Mart, with 5, 200 stores worldwide, influences everything including the price of all kinds of goods. It throws its weight behind environmental responsibility, and the impact could be amazing. “One little change in product packaging could save 1, 500 trees,” says Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott．“If everybody saves 1, 500 trees or 50 barrels of oil, at the end of the day you have made a huge difference.”
Scott wants Wal-Mart to do its part too. He has promised to cut the existing greenhouse-gas emissions（排放）over the next few years and promised to construct new stores that are more efficient. He wants Wal-Mart’s fleet of more than 7, 000 trucks to get twice as many miles per gallon by 2015. Factories that show Wal-Mart they’re cutting air pollution will get preferential treatment in the supply chain. Wal-Mart says it’s working with consumer-product manufacturers to reduce their packaging and will reward them if they do so.
Some people may doubt it is a bid to attract attention from Wal-Mart’s controversial labor and health-insurance practices. But it’s not just window dressing, because Wal-Mart sees profits in                                                                                          going green. Scott says, “This is a business philosophy, not a social philosophy. We don’t go where we don’t think there’s a great interest in change.”
Like Bill Gates, who started his charitable foundation, Scott happens to be promoting Wal-Mart’s image at a time when his company’s reputation is declining. He acknowledges that he launched the plan partly to shield （保護(hù)）Wal-Mart from bad press about its contribution to global warming. “By doing what we’re doing today, we avoid the headline risks that are going to come for people who did not do anything,” he says. “At some point businesses will be held responsible for the action they take.” Meanwhile, should Wal-Mart succeed at shrinking its environmental footprint and lowering prices for green products, both the planet and the company will profit.
【小題1】We can infer from the passage that ______.

A．Lee Scott is Wal-Mart’s CEO
B．there are 5, 200 stores in the world
C．Wal-Mart has a great influence on the world market
D．Wal-Mart has more than 7, 000 trucks all over the world
【小題2】What does the underlined sentence “This is a business philosophy, not a social philosophy.” mean in the fourth paragraph?
A．Wal-Mart predicts huge profits in its green activity.
B．Wal-Mart’s green activity is just window dressing.
C．Wal-Mart aims to solve its health-insurance practices.
D．Wal-Mart doesn’t have any social responsibility at all.
【小題3】What will Wal-Mart probably do in the future?
A．Reduce air pollution in its present stores.
B．Give favorable treatment to its consumers.
C．Ask the factories to reduce their packaging.
D．Demand the fleet of trucks to use more fuel than before.
【小題4】What is the main idea of the last paragraph?
A．Provide the background of the green plan.
B．Stress the purpose of Wal-Mart’s green plan.
C．Present the risk that Wal-Mart is facing nowadays.
D．Analyze the similarity between Bill Gates and Scott.

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語 來源： 題型：閱讀理解

Every time you go to the supermarket, you come away with your purchases in plastic bags. But wouldn’t it be kinder to the environment if you asked for paper bags instead?
The answer is not the easy as it might seem. Environmentalists say there are drawbacks to using both plastic bags and paper bags.
According to the American Plastics Council 80 percent of groceries in the US are packed in plastic bags.
“The numbers are becoming huge,” said Vincent Cobb, a businessman from Chicago who set up “reusable bags. com” on the Internet. He notes that consumers use between 500 billion and 1 trillion plastic bags per year worldwide.
Some experts believe that all these bags harm the environment. Plastic takes hundreds of years to break down and, as it does so, poisonous materials are released into the water and soil.
Further damage is caused if plastic bags enter the sea. For example, endangered sea turtles cannot tell the bags from jellyfish(水母), their main source of food, and often choke on them.
Floating plastic bags have been spotted as far north as the Arctic Ocean and as far south as the southern end of South America. One expert predicts that, within ten years, plastic bags will wash up in Antarctica!
However, this kind of bag does have its advantages.
“Plastic grocery bags are some of the most reused things around the house,” explained Laurie Kusek of the American Plastics Council.
According to the Film and Bag Federation, a trade group in the US plastics industry, paper bags use more energy and create more waste than plastic bags. Plastic bags require 40 per cent less energy to produce and cause 70 per cent less air pollution, the group explained. They also release as much as 94 percent less waste into the water than paper ones.
But paper bags do break down more quickly than plastic bags. They don’t endanger wildlife, either.
So what should we do? One possible solution would be to use biodegradable(能被生物分解的)plastic bags. But until biodegradable technology improves, it might be easier to pack things you buy in reusable cloth bags.
【小題1】The best title of the passage is _____.

A．Paper Causes Less Pollution 
B．Plastic Causes Less Pollution 
C．Paper and Plastics Cause Pollution 
D．Paper Bags Break Down More Quickly 
【小題2】The underlined word “drawbacks” might mean “_____”.
A．Advantages B．disadvantages C．a(chǎn)ir pollution D．waste 
【小題3】According to the passage, which of the following in NOT true?
A．Plastic takes longer to break down than paper. 
B．Sea turtles usually mistake the plastic bags for jellyfish. 
C．Paper bags require less energy than plastic bags. 
D．You’d better pack things in reusable cloth bags. 
【小題4】Which of the following shows that paper bags are better than plastic ones?
A．Paper bags take less time to rot. 
B．Paper bags cause less air pollution. 
C．Paper bags are more reusable. 
D．Paper bags cause less water pollution. 

查看答案和解析>>

同步練習(xí)冊答案