Question

A three-year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation conclusively (and unfortunately), establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception."
A CNN Reporter at the scene states that there is no evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon.
　  What hit the Pentagon? A Boeing 757 loaded with passengers and fuel right? Who was on Flight 757? According to the Flight Information there were No Arabs on it. That makes me wonder if Flight 757 actually existed at all.
　　From the pictures and the videos, people can find that there are several doubtful points that need to be taken into consideration, for example the marker line on the grass in the satellite and ground pictures, the different colors of the smoke, the hole which the plane impacted, and the standing pylons (架線塔).
　　Also, from the comparison of the different pictures, people can find some other strange points. For example, the gear (齒輪) is not the matching one. The wreckage of the plane is not the one from the American Airlines. The glass on the pavement of the pole is another doubtful point. The last thing that need considering is about the collapse. One of the gif video shows the plane impacting the Pentagon. The only problem with this video footage is that it has been altered (改變) and can not be fully trusted.
　　These crash photos and videos shown here clearly have been doctored (篡改) and don't even match the physics of what happened. So where is the real video? It leaves me many questions. Is this a missile? It is a real enigma.
【小題1】Where can you possibly read this article?

A．In a newspaper.

B．In a book.

C．On a website.

D．In a magazine.

【小題2】What the word “yielded” mean in the first sentence?

A．given in

B．surrendered

C．given away

D．produced

【小題3】Which of the following doubtful points is not mentioned in the passage?

A．the colors of the smoke	B．the model of the plane
C．the standing pylons	D．the marker line on the grass

【小題4】What is the author’s attitude towards the 911 investigation?

A．Positive.

B．Neutral.

C．Skeptical.

D．Negative.

Answer 1

【小題1】C
【小題2】D
【小題3】B
【小題4】C

解析試題分析：
【小題1】細(xì)節(jié)題，由第四段的第一句話From the pictures and the videos,可以知道是在網(wǎng)頁上，所以選C
【小題2】推理題，句子的意思“產(chǎn)生了新的目擊證人”，所以是產(chǎn)生的意思，所以選D
【小題3】細(xì)節(jié)題，由倒數(shù)第三段可以知道A和C，由倒數(shù)第二段第三行The glass on the pavement of the pole is another doubtful point所以選B
【小題4】推理題，由倒數(shù)第三段第一句話　From the pictures and the videos, people can find that there are several doubtful points that need to be taken into consideration,可以知道對911調(diào)查持懷疑態(tài)度，所以選C
考點(diǎn)：本文為一篇調(diào)查類短文。
點(diǎn)評：本文講述了對911事件持懷疑態(tài)度，重新調(diào)查，先通讀全文，然后帶著問題，再讀全文，找出答題所需要的依據(jù)，完成閱讀。本文主要考查推理題和細(xì)節(jié)題，要求學(xué)生有很強(qiáng)的推理分析能力和細(xì)節(jié)分析能力。