Question

The city can seem a cold, mean place. In the middle of so many people hurrying about their own business, a person can feel alone among the millions of others.
There is a popular view that in cities, strangers are less likely to help an elderly person cross a street or call the police when they see a bike being stolen. Recently, a New Yorker named Casey Neistat did an experiment. He chained up his bike in several public places, then "stole" it in a number of obvious ways, such as using a hacksaw (鋼鋸). He filmed everything to see whether other New Yorkers would try to stop a shameless bike theft. The result? People just walked on by.
Is this evidence of an immoral, selfish urban society? Not necessarily. According to another recent study, the way city people mind their own business is about other factors besides morality (道德).
This is called the Bystander Effect, the theory that city people do not react because of the urban enviromnent they live in.
Psychologist Dr. Harold explained why people did not involve themselves in Neistat's bike theft experiment with the Bystander Effect.
First, people who live in cities are surrounded by so much activity that they stop noticing what is going on around them. Second, they are less easy to surprise and assume every activity has a logical explanation.
"The third is that people notice it, but they don't know what to do," he continued. "And the fourth is fear — they know they should do something, but they're afraid to challenge someone with a hacksaw."
A lack of concern is only a small reason why people don't take action, concludes Dr. Harold.
Despite the results of Neistat's experiment, there is also evidence of a sense of team spirit that connects people in cities. All it takes is a funny joke or a shared interest to start a conversation with someone at a bus stop. When city folk are in trouble, they come together for support — famously in New York on September 11, 2001.
City society is different, but that doesn't mean it's cold or mean — it just means it's busy!

1. 1.
   Casey Neistat fihned everything in the experiment with the purpose of       .
   1. A.
      proving that he was not the thief
   2. B.
      telling people that bike theft was immoral
   3. C.
      finding out who had a sense of right and wrong
   4. D.
      making his experiment well-known to the public
2. 2.
   We can infer from the third paragraph that morality      .
   1. A.
      can partly explain a selfish urban society
   2. B.
      is what our society should pay special attention to
   3. C.
      is the only factor that leads to a selfish urban society
   4. D.
      is the root of the Bystander Effect mentioned in the passage
3. 3.
   The underlined part September 11, 2001 in Paragraph 9 serves as      .
   1. A.
      a reminder of the sad memories
   2. B.
      a way to prove Dr Harold's Bystander effect
   3. C.
      evidence that city life can be really dangerous
   4. D.
      an example to show team spirit connecting city people
4. 4.
   As can be inferred from the passage, the writer probably      .
   1. A.
      criticizes the loss of morality in urban society
   2. B.
      feels sad about the result of Neistat's experiment
   3. C.
      thinks city people are too busy to care about others
   4. D.
      disagrees that city life sometimes can be cold and mean

Answer 1

CADD
本文講述了城市生活中充滿了冷淡，這到底是道德的淪喪還是腳步匆匆的緣故？
1.C 推斷題。紐約人做這個實驗的目的就是想看看是否有人會阻止他“偷”自行車。也就是說證明城市中人時候有是非觀。
2.A 細節(jié)推理題。根據(jù)第三段內(nèi)容可知，城市中的人只管自己的事，這樣的生活方式未必只與道德有關。
3.D推理題。通過9.11事件，作者只是想證明當人們處于困境中時，團隊精神還是存在的。
4.D 推理題。根據(jù)最后一段可知，作者認為人與人之間的冷漠可能是因為人們太忙。