閱讀理解。
Bicycle Safety
Operation  Always ride your bike in a safe, controlled manner on campus(校園). Obey rules and
regulations. Watch out for walkers and other bicyclists, and always use your lights in dark conditions.
Theft Prevention Always securely lock your bicycle to a bicycle rack---even if you are only away for
a minute. Register your bike with the University Department of Public Safety. It's fast, easy, and free.
Registration permanently records your serial number, which is useful in the possible recovery of the bike
stolen.
Equipment
              
Brakes Make sure that they are in good working order and adjusted properly.
              
Helmet A necessity, make sure your helmet meets current safety standards and fit
properly.
                
Lights Always have a front headlight---visible at least 500 feet in front of the
bike. A taillight is a good idea.
Rules of the Road
Riding on Campus  As a bicycle rider, you have a responsibility to ride only on streets and posted
bicycle paths. Riding on sidewalks or other walkways can lead to a fine. The speed limit for bicycles on
campus is 15mph, unless otherwise posted. Always give the right of ways to walkers. If you are involved
in an accident, you are required to offer appropriate aid, call the Department of Public Safety and remain
at the scene until the officer lets you go.
Bicycle Parking  Only park in areas reserved for bikes. Trees, handrails, hallways, and sign posts are
not for bicycle parking, and parking in such posts can result in a fine.
If Things Go Wrong
If you break the rules, you will be fined. Besides violating rules while riding bicycles on campus, you
could be fined for:
No bicycle registration---------------------------------------------------$25
 Bicycle parking banned--------------------------------------------------$30
 Blocking path with bicycle ---------------------------------------------$40
 Violation of bicycle equipment requirement -------------------------$35
1. Registration of your bicycle may help you _____________.
A. find y our stolen bicycle
B. get your serial number
C. receive free repair services
D. settle conflicts with walkers
2. According to the passage, what bike equipment is a free choice for bicycle riders?
A. Brakes.
B. A helmet.        
C. A headlight.      
D.A taillight.
3. When you ride a bicycle on the campus, ___________.
A. ride on posted bicycle paths and sidewalks
B. cycle at a speed of over 15 mph
C. put the walkers' right of way first    
D. call the police before leaving in a case of accident
4. If you lock your bicycle to a tree on the campus, you could be fined _________.
A. $25
B. $30
C. $35
D. $40
5 What is the passage mainly about?
A. A guide for safe bicycling on campus.      
B. Directions for bicycle tour on campus.
C. Regulations of bicycle race on campus.    
D. Rules for riding motor vehicles on campus.
練習(xí)冊(cè)系列答案
相關(guān)習(xí)題

科目：高中英語(yǔ) 來(lái)源：江西省宜春中學(xué)2011屆高三10月月考英語(yǔ)試卷 題型：050

閱讀理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金磚四國(guó))?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker-BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach's famous marketing device(策略),the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?”asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreigh Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of“The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country's economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　But the BRICs are not just about economy．As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors to focus on the big promising players．From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs．Its stock(股票)market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three．

　　At very least, however, Russia's economic underperformance and stock market outperfoumance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?

[　　]

A．

China．

B．

Russia．

C．

Brazil．

D．

India．

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn't be a BRIC partly because ________．

[　　]

A．

Russia's economic performance is far worse than the other three

B．

Russia's leaders are not good at managing economy

C．

Russia has taken effective measures to improve its economy

D．

Russia will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that ________．

[　　]

A．

Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government

B．

Russia outperfoumed the other three countries in stock market

C．

most people disagree Russia is included in BRICs

D．

the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to ________．

[　　]

A．

suggest it's time to kick Russia out of the BRICs?

B．

feel worried about the economy of the BRICs

C．

think Russia is worth being one of the group

D．

show disappointment to Russia's economy

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語(yǔ) 來(lái)源：湖北省“9＋4”聯(lián)合體2010－2011學(xué)年高二下學(xué)期期中聯(lián)考英語(yǔ)試題 題型：050

閱讀理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金磚四國(guó))?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker－BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach's famous marketing device(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?”asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of“The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country's economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　But the BRICs are not just about economy．As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors(投資者)to focus on the big promising players．From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs．Its stock market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three．

　　At very least, despite Russia's economic underperformance, its stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?

[　　]

A．

China

B．

Russia

C．

Brazil

D．

India

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn't be a BRIC partly because ________．

[　　]

A．

its economic performance is worse than that of the others

B．

its leaders are not good at managing economy

C．

it has taken effective measures to improve its economy

D．

it will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that ________．

[　　]

A．

Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government

B．

Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market

C．

most people disagree Russia is included in the BRICs

D．

the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to ________．

[　　]

A．

suggest it's time to kick Russia out of the BRICs

B．

feel worried about the economy of the BRICs

C．

think Russia is worth being one of the group

D．

show disappointment to Russia's economy

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語(yǔ) 來(lái)源：山東省泗水一中2010-2011學(xué)年高二下學(xué)期期末考試英語(yǔ)試卷 題型：050

閱讀理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金磚四國(guó))?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker－BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach’s famous marketing device(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?” asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of “The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country’s economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6．7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8．5 percent and India 5．4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0．7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　But the BRICs are not just about economy．As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors(投資者)to focus on the big promising players．From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs．Its stock market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three．

　　At very least, despite Russia’s economic underperformance, its stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?

[　　]

A．

China

B．

Russia

C．

Brazil

D．

India

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn’t be a BRIC partly because _________．

[　　]

A．

its economic performance is worse than that of the others

B．

its leaders are not good at managing economy

C．

it has taken effective measures to improve its economy

D．

it will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that _________．

[　　]

A．

Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government

B．

Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market

C．

most people disagree Russia is included in the BRICs

D．

the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to _________．

[　　]

A．

suggest it’s time to kick Russia out of the BRICs

B．

feel worried about the economy of the BRICs

C．

think Russia is worth being one of the group

D．

show disappointment to Russia’s economy

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英語(yǔ) 來(lái)源：0103 月考題 題型：閱讀理解

閱讀理解。
     Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs (金磚四國(guó))? If so, it may end up sounding like a famous
ball-point pen maker-BIC. An argument is being made that Goldman Sach's famous marketing device
(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs.
     "Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?" asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute
for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy. Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew
Kuchins of  "The Russian Balance Sheet", thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of
inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses. He writes:
     "The country's economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has
any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group. I have just returned
from Moscow, which is always dull around this season. For the last seven years, Russia has taken very
few measures to improve its economy. Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas."
     Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side. The International Monetary Fund figures that the
Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent.
There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia.
     But the BRICs are not just about economy. As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage
investors (投資者)to focus on the big promising players. From an investment standpoint, it could be argued
that Russia is leading the BRICs. Its stock (股票) market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent
is for the other three.
     At very least, however, Russia's economic underperformance and stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group.
1. According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?
A. China.
B. Russia.
C. Brazil.
D. India.
2. According to Aslund, Russia shouldn't be a BRIC partly because _____.
A. Russia's economic performance is far worse than the other three
B. Russia's leaders are not good at managing economy
C. Russia has taken effective measures to improve its economy
D. Russia will no longer attract investors from other countries
3. From the passage we know that _____.
A. Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government
B. Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market
C. most people disagree Russia is included in BRICs
D. the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later
4. The author seems to _____.
A. suggest it's time to kick Russia out of the BRICs?
B. feel worried about the economy of the BRICs
C. think Russia is worth being one of the group
D. show disappointment to Russia's economy

查看答案和解析>>

同步練習(xí)冊(cè)答案