Question

【題目】Answer the questions（根據(jù)短文內容回答下列問題）

In general, laws for children are a good thing. One hundred years ago in industrial countries, children worked 18 hours a day in a factory at age seven. The factory owner could beat a child who fell asleep or was not fast enough. Both parents and teachers could do the same.

Today, there are many laws about children all over the world. Some people think children must obey rules or they should be punished others do not agree. The Inuits or Eskimos in Alaska almost never punish their children. The parents don’t hit them. If the children go too far, the parents punish them by making fun of them.

Children in other parts of the world are not as lucky as Eskimo children. American parents can spank（打……臀部） their children at home, but a teacher cannot hit a child in public school. This is also true in Germany. In contrast（對比）, it is against the law for anyone to hit a child in Sweden. Swedish parents cannot spank their children. The children also have a special government official who works for their rights. There is even a plan for children to divorce from their parents though this is not a law yet！

【1】How were children treated in industrial countries 100 years ago？

________________________________________________________

【2】What does the author mean by “go too far？”

________________________________________________

【3】Can a teacher in Germany hit his students in public school？

_________________________________________________

【4】What kind of people can beat children in Sweden？

_________________________________________

【5】What does it mean by “a plan for children to divorce from their parents？”

________________________________________

【6】How do you think parents in China should educate their children if they don’t behave？

_______________________________________

Answer 1

【答案】

【1】They were treated badly.

【2】Do something improper too much.

【3】No. he can't.

【4】None can do that.

【5】A plan for ending the children’s relationship with their parents.

【6】They should learn from Swedish parents and never beat their children. （合理即可）

【解析】

本文介紹了世界各地有許多關于兒童的法律。有些國家的父母和老師不打孩子們，但是有些國家的父母和老師打孩子們。

【1】根據(jù)One hundred years ago in industrial countries, children worked 18 hours a day in a factory at age seven. The factory owner could beat a child who fell asleep or was not fast enough. Both parents and teachers could do the same.可知，在100年前，孩子們很小就在工廠工作很長時間，工廠主人會打孩子們，老師和父母也打孩子們，因此孩子們受到了惡劣地對待。故填They were treated badly.

【2】根據(jù)the parents punish them by making fun of them.可知，父母會懲罰他們，因此表示他們做了很多不正確的事，故填Do something improper too much.

【3】根據(jù)American parents can spank（打……臀部） their children at home, but a teacher cannot hit a child in public school. This is also true in Germany.可知，在德國，老師不能在公立學校打孩子。因此用否定回答，故填No, he can't.

【4】根據(jù)In contrast（對比）, it is against the law for anyone to hit a child in Sweden. Swedish parents cannot spank their children.可知，在瑞典，任何人打小孩都是違法的。瑞典父母不能打孩子屁股。因此在瑞典沒有人可以打孩子，故填None can do that.

【5】There is even a plan for children to divorce from their parents though this is not a law yet！表示甚至還有一個讓孩子與父母分離的計劃，盡管這還不是法律!因此這表示是一個結束孩子和父母關系的計劃。故填A plan for ending the children’s relationship with their parents.

【6】根據(jù)Swedish parents cannot spank their children.可知，瑞典的父母不打他們的孩子，因此中國的父母，應該向瑞典的父母學習，從來不打他們的孩子們。故填They should learn from Swedish parents and never beat their children.

認真閱讀問題，根據(jù)問題要求，在文中尋找答案所在的語句或段落，進行分析理解，概括歸納，寫出正確的答案。例如小題4，根據(jù)In contrast（對比）, it is against the law for anyone to hit a child in Sweden. Swedish parents cannot spank their children.可知，在瑞典，任何人打小孩都是違法的。瑞典父母不能打孩子屁股。因此在瑞典沒有人可以打孩子，故填None can do that.