Question

Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization. The incident then resulted in a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs was stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Beijing section of Jingha expressway.
Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast one in Jilin Province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.
After negotiations  (協(xié)商)  with the truck driver and a philanthropic  (慈善)  founda tion, Shangshan Foundation purchased these dogs with much money. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA) , being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the dog saving mission was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.
Some net users argue the dog saving mission is placing too much attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.
A microblogger "Xiaowulaitajie" said on China's twitter-like website, weibo. com, "Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media attention. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people. "
Another microblogger, Liluping, said "We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief. "
Some applaud volunteers' actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics. They argue that such act nevertheless embodies social progress.
A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not go against taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
小題1:. According to the passage, we know the article probably comes from________ .

A．a(chǎn) science fiction	B．a(chǎn) TV programme
C．the Internet	D．a(chǎn) magazine

小題2:. Which one has the similar meaning to the underlined word “embodies”?

A．express.	B．share.
C．emphasize.	D．prevent.

小題3:. Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?

A．Some net users'.	B．Liluping's.
C． Broken bridge 's.	D． Xiaowulaitajie's.

小題4:. What does the passage mainly talk about?

A．Why some people disagree to save the 500 dogs.

B．How the volunteers saved the 500 dogs to be killed.

C．These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.

D．Different Chinese net users have different opinions on the mission.

Answer 1

小題1:C
小題2:A
小題3:C
小題4:D

試題分析：這篇文章主要講了網(wǎng)民們針對是否要投大量資金救助待宰殺的狗狗而展開的爭論。
小題1:細(xì)節(jié)題：根據(jù)The incident then resulted in a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.可知拯救狗狗的話題辯論是在網(wǎng)上展開的. 故選C。
小題2:猜詞題：根據(jù)Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics. They argue that such act nevertheless embodies social progress.可知有些網(wǎng)民認(rèn)為這種行為沒有表示社會進步，故選B。
小題3:推斷題：根據(jù)A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not go against taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
和  I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
可知作者與broken bridge的觀點一致，故選D。
小題4:主旨題：根據(jù)The incident then resulted in a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs..可知本文是不同的中國網(wǎng)民救助狗狗的不同觀點，故選B。